Mechanical computing - Nature.com

1. 1.

   Freeth, T. et al. Decoding the ancient Greek astronomical calculator known as the Antikythera mechanism. Nature 444, 587–591 (2006).

   ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

2. 2.

   Bromley, A. G. Charles Babbage’s analytical engine, 1838. Ann. Hist. Comput. 20, 29–45 (1998).

   MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

3. 3.

   Bush, V. The differential analyzer. A new machine for solving differential equations. J. Franklin Inst. 212, 447–488 (1931).

   MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

4. 4.

   Roy, K., Jaiswal, A. Panda, P. Towards spike-based machine intelligence with neuromorphic computing. Nature 575, 607–617 (2019).

   ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

5. 5.

   Adleman, L. M. Molecular computation of solutions to combinatorial problems. Science 266, 1021–1024 (1994).

   ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

6. 6.

   McEvoy, M. A. Correll, N. Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication. Science 347, 1261689 (2015).

   CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

7. 7.

   Hauser, H., Ijspeert, A. J., Füchslin, R. M., Pfeifer, R. Maass, W. Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies. Biol. Cybern. 105, 355–370 (2011).

   MathSciNet  PubMed  MATH  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

8. 8.

   Müller, V. C. Hoffmann, M. What is morphological computation? On how the body contributes to cognition and control. Artif. Life 23, 1–24 (2017).

   PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

9. 9.

   Laschi, C. Mazzolai, B. Lessons from animals and plants: the symbiosis of morphological computation and soft robotics. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 23, 107–114 (2016).

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. 10.

    Caulfield, H. J. Dolev, S. Why future supercomputing requires optics. Nat. Photon. 4, 261–263 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

11. 11.

    Miller, D. A. Are optical transistors the logical next step? Nat. Photon. 4, 3–5 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

12. 12.

    Ospelkaus, C. et al. Microwave quantum logic gates for trapped ions. Nature 476, 181–184 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

13. 13.

    Lekitsch, B. et al. Blueprint for a microwave trapped ion quantum computer. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601540 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

14. 14.

    Katsikis, G., Cybulski, J. S. Prakash, M. Synchronous universal droplet logic and control. Nat. Phys. 11, 588–596 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

15. 15.

    Weaver, J. A., Melin, J., Stark, D., Quake, S. R. Horowitz, M. A. Static control logic for microfluidic devices using pressure-gain valves. Nat. Phys. 6, 218–223 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

16. 16.

    Mosadegh, B., Bersano-Begey, T., Park, J. Y., Burns, M. A. Takayama, S. Next-generation integrated microfluidic circuits. Lab Chip 11, 2813–2818 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

17. 17.

    Woodhouse, F. G. Dunkel, J. Active matter logic for autonomous microfluidics. Nat. Commun. 8, 15169 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

18. 18.

    Preston, D. J. et al. Digital logic for soft devices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7750–7759 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

19. 19.

    Volkov, A. G., Adesina, T., Markin, V. S. Jovanov, E. Kinetics and mechanism of Dionaea muscipula trap closing. Plant Physiol. 146, 323–324 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

20. 20.

    Yang, R., Lenaghan, S. C., Zhang, M. Xia, L. A mathematical model on the closing and opening mechanism for venus flytrap. Plant Signal. Behav. 5, 968–978 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

21. 21.

    Jiang, Y., Korpas, L. M. Raney, J. R. Bifurcation-based embodied logic and autonomous actuation. Nat. Commun. 10, 128 (2019). Demonstrates environmentally responsive mechanical logic by using bistable beam mechanisms and stimuli-responsive materials.

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

22. 22.

    Horsman, C., Stepney, S., Wagner, R. C. Kendon, V. When does a physical system compute? Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. A 470, 20140182 (2014). Provides a framework for unconventional computing, distinguishing abstract computation from physical embodiment.

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

23. 23.

    Feynman, R. P. Feynman Lectures on Computation (CRC Press, 2018).

24. 24.

    MacLennan, B. J. Natural computation and non-Turing models of computation. Theor. Comput. Sci. 317, 115–145 (2004).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

25. 25.

    Silva, A. et al. Performing mathematical operations with metamaterials. Science 343, 160–163 (2014).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

26. 26.

    Mohammadi Estakhri, N., Edwards, B. Engheta, N. Inverse-designed metastructures that solve equations. Science 363, 1333–1338 (2019).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

27. 27.

    Zangeneh-Nejad, F. Fleury, R. Topological analog signal processing. Nat. Commun. 10, 2058 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

28. 28.

    Howell, L. L. Compliant Mechanisms (John Wiley Sons, 2001).

29. 29.

    Qiu, J., Lang, J. H. Slocum, A. H. A curved-beam bistable mechanism. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 13, 137–146 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

30. 30.

    Oh, Y. S. Kota, S. Synthesis of multistable equilibrium compliant mechanisms using combinations of bistable mechanisms. J. Mech. Des. 131, 021002 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

31. 31.

    Cazottes, P., Fernandes, A., Pouget, J. Hafez, M. Bistable buckled beam: modeling of actuating force and experimental validations. J. Mech. Des. 131, 101001 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

32. 32.

    Camescasse, B., Fernandes, A. Pouget, J. Bistable buckled beam: elastica modeling and analysis of static actuation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 50, 2881–2893 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. 33.

    Wu, C. C., Lin, M. J. Chen, R. The derivation of a bistable criterion for double V-beam mechanisms. J. Micromech. Microeng. 23, 115005 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

34. 34.

    Ion, A., Wall, L., Kovacs, R. Baudisch, P. Digital mechanical metamaterials. In Proc. 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 977–988 (ACM, 2017). Demonstrates the use of 3D-printed modular bistable elements to perform digital logic, including ‘combination lock’ mechanisms.

35. 35.

    Song, Y. et al. Additively manufacturable micro-mechanical logic gates. Nat. Commun. 10, 882 (2019). Realizes a full set of digital mechanical logic gates via 3D printing of bistable flexural beams.

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

36. 36.

    Hälg, B. On a micro-electro-mechanical nonvolatile memory cell. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 37, 2230–2236 (1990). Provides an early example of the use of constrained beams to represent binary information.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

37. 37.

    Raney, J. R. et al. Stable propagation of mechanical signals in soft media using stored elastic energy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9722–9727 (2016). Demonstrates mechanical diodes and logic gates based on the propagation of stable, nonlinear transition waves in architected soft systems of coupled bistable beams.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

38. 38.

    Yasuda, H., Tachi, T., Lee, M. Yang, J. Origami-based tunable truss structures for non-volatile mechanical memory operation. Nat. Commun. 8, 962 (2017). Demonstrates volumetric origami cells with tuneable stability and stiffness that store bit information in a bistable potential-energy landscape.

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

39. 39.

    Hanna, B. H., Lund, J. M., Lang, R. J., Magleby, S. P. Howell, L. L. Waterbomb base: a symmetric single-vertex bistable origami mechanism. Smart Mater. Struct. 23, 094009 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

40. 40.

    Silverberg, J. L. et al. Origami structures with a critical transition to bistability arising from hidden degrees of freedom. Nat. Mater. 14, 389–393 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

41. 41.

    Saito, K., Tsukahara, A. Okabe, Y. New deployable structures based on an elastic origami model. J. Mech. Des. 137, 021402 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

42. 42.

    Jianguo, C., Xiaowei, D., Ya, Z., Jian, F. Yongming, T. Bistable behavior of the cylindrical origami structure with Kresling pattern. J. Mech. Des. 137, 061406 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

43. 43.

    Waitukaitis, S., Menaut, R., Chen, B. G. van Hecke, M. Origami multistability: from single vertices to metasheets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 055503 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

44. 44.

    Yasuda, H. Yang, J. Reentrant origami-based metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio and bistability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 185502 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

45. 45.

    Ishida, S., Uchida, H., Shimosaka, H. Hagiwara, I. Design and numerical analysis of vibration isolators with quasi-zero-stiffness characteristics using bistable foldable structures. J. Vib. Acoust. 139, 031015 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

46. 46.

    Fang, H., Li, S., Ji, H. Wang, K. W. Dynamics of a bistable Miura-origami structure. Phys. Rev. E 95, 052211 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

47. 47.

    Kamrava, S., Mousanezhad, D., Ebrahimi, H., Ghosh, R. Vaziri, A. Origami-based cellular metamaterial with auxetic, bistable, and self-locking properties. Sci. Rep. 7, 46046 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

48. 48.

    Faber, J. A., Arrieta, A. F. Studart, A. R. Bioinspired spring origami. Science 359, 1386–1391 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

49. 49.

    Filipov, E. T. Redoutey, M. Mechanical characteristics of the bistable origami hypar. Extreme Mech. Lett. 25, 16–26 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

50. 50.

    Sengupta, S. Li, S. Harnessing the anisotropic multistability of stackedorigami mechanical metamaterials for effective modulus programming. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 29, 2933–2945 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

51. 51.

    Liu, K., Tachi, T. Paulino, G. H. Invariant and smooth limit of discrete geometry folded from bistable origami leading to multistable metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 10, 4238 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

52. 52.

    Bhovad, P., Kaufmann, J. Li, S. Peristaltic locomotion without digital controllers: exploiting multi-stability in origami to coordinate robotic motion. Extreme Mech. Lett. 32, 100552 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

53. 53.

    Yang, N., Zhang, M., Zhu, R. Niu, X. D. Modular metamaterials composed of foldable obelisk-like units with reprogrammable mechanical behaviors based on multistability. Sci. Rep. 9, 18812 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

54. 54.

    Wang, L.-C. et al. Active reconfigurable tristable square-twist origami. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1909087 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

55. 55.

    Treml, B., Gillman, A., Buskohl, P. Vaia, R. Origami mechanologic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6916–6921 (2018). Presents an environmentally responsive origami platform using the waterbomb fold pattern as a mechanical storage device that writes, erases and rewrites itself in response to a time-varying environmental signal.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

56. 56.

    Glusker, M., Hogan, D. M. Vass, P. The ternary calculating machine of Thomas Fowler. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 27, 4–22 (2005).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

57. 57.

    Hayes, B. Computing science: third base. Am. Sci. 89, 490–494 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

58. 58.

    Yasuda, H., Korpas, L. M. Raney, J. R. Transition waves and formation of domain walls in multistable mechanical metamaterials. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 054067 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

59. 59.

    Mahboob, I. Yamaguchi, H. Bit storage and bit flip operations in an electromechanical oscillator. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 275–279 (2008). Demonstrates a volatile mechanical memory device in which binary information is abstracted in the phase offset of the beam oscillation.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

60. 60.

    Badzey, R. L., Zolfagharkhani, G., Gaidarzhy, A. Mohanty, P. A controllable nanomechanical memory element. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 3587 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

61. 61.

    Noh, H., Shim, S. B., Jung, M., Khim, Z. G. Kim, J. A mechanical memory with a dc modulation of nonlinear resonance. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 033116 (2010).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

62. 62.

    Mahboob, I., Flurin, E., Nishiguchi, K., Fujiwara, A. Yamaguchi, H. Interconnect-free parallel logic circuits in a single mechanical resonator. Nat. Commun. 2, 198 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

63. 63.

    Ahmed, S. et al. A compact adder and reprogrammable logic gate using micro-electromechanical resonators with partial electrodes. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 66, 2057–2061 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

64. 64.

    Serra-Garcia, M. Turing-complete mechanical processor via automated nonlinear system design. Phys. Rev. E 100, 042202 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

65. 65.

    Venstra, W. J., Westra, H. J. R. Van Der Zant, H. S. J. Mechanical stiffening, bistability, and bit operations in a microcantilever. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 193107 (2010). Utilizes nonlinear dynamics in microcantilevers to demonstrate bit operations in volatile dynamic systems through modulation of the driving frequency.

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

66. 66.

    Zhang, S., Yin, L. Fang, N. Focusing ultrasound with an acoustic metamaterial network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 194301 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

67. 67.

    Nesterenko, V. F. Dynamics of Heterogeneous Materials (Springer-Verlag, 2001).

68. 68.

    Liang, B., Guo, X. S., Tu, J., Zhang, D. Cheng, J. C. An acoustic rectifier. Nat. Mater. 9, 989–992 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

69. 69.

    Li, N. et al. Colloquium: Phononics: Manipulating heat flow with electronic analogs and beyond. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1045–1066 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

70. 70.

    Maldovan, M. Sound and heat revolutions in phononics. Nature 503, 209–217 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

71. 71.

    Kim, E. Yang, J. Wave propagation in single column woodpile phononic crystals: formation of tunable band gaps. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 71, 33–45 (2014).

    ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

72. 72.

    Fleury, R., Sounas, D. L., Sieck, C. F., Haberman, M. R. Alù, A. Sound isolation and giant linear nonreciprocity in a compact acoustic circulator. Science 343, 516–519 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

73. 73.

    Zheng, B. Xu, J. Mechanical logic switches based on DNA-inspired acoustic metamaterials with ultrabroad low-frequency band gaps. J. Phys. D 50, 465601 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

74. 74.

    Bilal, O. R., Foehr, A. Daraio, C. Bistable metamaterial for switching and cascading elastic vibrations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4603–4606 (2017). Uses geometric nonlinearities to switch and amplify elastic vibrations via magnetic coupling, allowing logic and simple calculations.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

75. 75.

    Li, F., Anzel, P., Yang, J., Kevrekidis, P. G. Daraio, C. Granular acoustic switches and logic elements. Nat. Commun. 5, 5311 (2014). Provides an example of a mechanical metamaterial that allows logic operations via nonlinear dynamics in a granular chain.

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

76. 76.

    Li, X. F. et al. Tunable unidirectional sound propagation through a sonic-crystal-based acoustic diode. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 084301 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

77. 77.

    Babaee, S., Viard, N., Wang, P., Fang, N. X. Bertoldi, K. Harnessing deformation to switch on and off the propagation of sound. Adv. Mater. 28, 1631–1635 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

78. 78.

    Merkle, R. C. Two types of mechanical reversible logic. Nanotechnology 4, 114–131 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

79. 79.

    Howard, M. LEGO Logic Gates and Mechanical Computing https://www.randomwraith.com/logic.html (accessed 19 August 2020).

80. 80.

    Saharia, K. Lego Logic http://web.archive.org/web/20140206173429/http://keshavsaharia.com/2011/05/29/lego-logic (accessed 19 August 2020).

81. 81.

    Merkle, R. C. et al. Mechanical computing systems using only links and rotary joints. J. Mech. Robot. 10, 061006 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

82. 82.

    Berwind, M. F., Kamas, A. Eberl, C. A hierarchical programmable mechanical metamaterial unit cell showing metastable shape memory. Adv. Eng. Mater. 20, 1800771 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

83. 83.

    Zhang, T., Cheng, Y., Guo, J. Z., Xu, J. Y. Liu, X. J. Acoustic logic gates and Boolean operation based on self-collimating acoustic beams. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 113503 (2015).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

84. 84.

    Wu, Q., Cui, C., Bertrand, T., Shattuck, M. D. O’Hern, C. S. Active acoustic switches using two-dimensional granular crystals. Phys. Rev. E 99, 062901 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

85. 85.

    Faber, J. A., Udani, J. P., Riley, K. S., Studart, A. R. Arrieta, A. F. Dome-patterned metamaterial sheets. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001955 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

86. 86.

    Shan, S. et al. Multistable architected materials for trapping elastic strain energy. Adv. Mater. 27, 4296–4301 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

87. 87.

    Coulais, C., Teomy, E., de Reus, K., Shokef, Y. van Hecke, M. Combinatorial design of textured mechanical metamaterials. Nature 535, 529–532 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

88. 88.

    Frenzel, T., Kadic, M. Wegener, M. Three-dimensional mechanical metamaterials with a twist. Science 358, 1072–1074 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

89. 89.

    Kane, C. L. Lubensky, T. C. Topological boundary modes in isostatic lattices. Nat. Phys. 10, 39–45 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

90. 90.

    Süsstrunk, R. Huber, S. D. Observation of phononic helical edge states in a mechanical topological insulator. Science 349, 47–50 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

91. 91.

    Nash, L. M. et al. Topological mechanics of gyroscopic metamaterials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14495–14500 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

92. 92.

    Paulose, J., Meeussen, A. S. Vitelli, V. Selective buckling via states of self-stress in topological metamaterials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7639–7644 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

93. 93.

    Chaunsali, R., Chen, C. W. Yang, J. Experimental demonstration of topological waveguiding in elastic plates with local resonators. New J. Phys. 20, 113036 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

94. 94.

    Liu, B. et al. Topological kinematics of origami metamaterials. Nat. Phys. 14, 811–815 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

95. 95.

    Shi, X., Chaunsali, R., Li, F. Yang, J. Elastic Weyl points and surface arc states in three-dimensional structures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 024058 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

96. 96.

    Bilal, O. R., Süsstrunk, R., Daraio, C. Huber, S. D. Intrinsically polar elastic metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700540 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

97. 97.

    Sigmund, O. On the design of compliant mechanisms using topology optimization. Mechan. Struct. Mach. 25, 493–524 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

98. 98.

    Howell, L. L., Midha, A. Norton, T. Evaluation of equivalent spring stiffness for use in a pseudo-rigid-body model of large-deflection compliant mechanisms. J. Mech. Des. 118, 126–131 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

99. 99.

    Rocks, J. W. et al. Designing allostery-inspired response in mechanical networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2520–2525 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

100. 100.

     Bielefeldt, B. R., Akleman, E., Reich, G. W., Beran, P. S. Hartl, D. J. L-system-generated mechanism topology optimization using graph-based interpretation. J. Mech. Robot. 11, 020905 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

101. 101.

     Wilson, K. E., Henke, E.-F. M., Slipher, G. A. Anderson, I. A. Rubbery logic gates. Extreme Mech. Lett. 9, 188–194 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

102. 102.

     Chau, N., Slipher, G. A., O’Brien, B. M., Mrozek, R. A. Anderson, I. A. A solid-state dielectric elastomer switch for soft logic. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 103506 (2016).

     ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

103. 103.

     Wissman, J., Dickey, M. D. Majidi, C. Field-controlled electrical switch with liquid metal. Adv. Sci. 4, 1700169 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

104. 104.

     Le Ferrand, H., Studart, A. R. Arrieta, A. F. Filtered mechanosensing using snapping composites with embedded mechano-electrical transduction. ACS Nano 13, 4752–4760 (2019).

     PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

105. 105.

     Abdullah, A. M., Braun, P. V. Hsia, K. J. Programmable shape transformation of elastic spherical domes. Soft Matter 12, 6184–6195 (2016).

     ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

106. 106.

     Chen, T., Bilal, O. R., Shea, K. Daraio, C. Harnessing bistability for directional propulsion of soft, untethered robots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5698–5702 (2018).

     ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

107. 107.

     Ambulo, C. P. et al. Four-dimensional printing of liquid crystal elastomers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 37332–37339 (2017).

     CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

108. 108.

     Wani, O. M., Zeng, H. Priimagi, A. A light-driven artificial flytrap. Nat. Commun. 8, 15546 (2017).

     ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

109. 109.

     Deirram, N., Zhang, C., Kermaniyan, S. S., Johnston, A. P. R. Such, G. K. pH-responsive polymer nanoparticles for drug delivery. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 40, e1800917 (2019).

     PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

110. 110.

     Loukaides, E. G., Smoukov, S. K. Seffen, K. A. Magnetic actuation and transition shapes of a bistable spherical cap. Int. J. Smart Nano Mater. 5, 270–282 (2014).

     CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

111. 111.

     Kim, Y., Yuk, H., Zhao, R., Chester, S. A. Zhao, X. Printing ferromagnetic domains for untethered fast-transforming soft materials. Nature 558, 274–279 (2018).

     ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

112. 112.

     Jackson, J. A. et al. Field responsive mechanical metamaterials. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau6419 (2018).

     ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

113. 113.

     Jin, Y. et al. Materials tactile logic via innervated soft thermochromic elastomers. Nat. Commun. 10, 4187 (2019).

     ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

114. 114.

     Hu, W., Lum, G. Z., Mastrangeli, M. Sitti, M. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 554, 81–85 (2018).

     ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

115. 115.

     Zhao, H., O’Brien, K., Li, S. Shepherd, R. F. Optoelectronically innervated soft prosthetic hand via stretchable optical waveguides. Sci. Robot. 1, eaai7529 (2016).

     PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

116. 116.

     Truby, R. L. et al. Soft somatosensitive actuators via embedded 3D printing. Adv. Mater. 30, e1706383 (2018).

     PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

117. 117.

     Lee, T. H., Bhunia, S. Mehregany, M. Electromechanical computing at 500 degrees C with silicon carbide. Science 329, 1316–1318 (2010). Demonstrates the capability of electromechanical switches at high temperature.

     ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

118. 118.

     Blakey, E. in Advances in Unconventional Computing. Emergence, Complexity and Computation (ed. Adamatzky, A.) 165–182 (Springer, 2017).

119. 119.

     Roukes, M. L. Mechanical computation, redux? In IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 2004 539–542 (IEEE, 2004).

120. 120.

     Masmanidis, S. C. et al. Multifunctional nanomechanical systems via tunably coupled piezoelectric actuation. Science 317, 780–783 (2007).

     ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

121. 121.

     Pott, B. V. et al. Mechanical computing redux: relays for integrated circuit applications. Proc. IEEE 98, 2076–2094 (2010).

     CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

122. 122.

     Kam, H., Liu, T. J. K., Stojanović, V., Marković, D. Alon, E. Design, optimization, and scaling of MEM relays for ultra-low-power digital logic. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 58, 236–250 (2011).

     ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

123. 123.

     Wang, J. Perez, L. The effectiveness of data augmentation in image classification using deep learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.04621 (2017).

124. 124.

     Houthooft, R. et al. VIME: variational information maximizing exploration. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 29, 1109–1117 (2016).

     Google Scholar 

125. 125.

     Null, L. Lobur, J. The Essentials of Computer Organization and Architecture (Jones Bartlett Publishers, 2015).

126. 126.

     Sauder, J. et al. Automation Rover for Extreme Environments: NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Phase I Final Report https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/niac_2016_phasei_saunder_aree_tagged.pdf (NASA, 2017).

Download references